Background of the Study
Tax avoidance involves legally exploiting loopholes in tax laws to minimize tax liabilities. While it is not illegal, the practice often raises ethical concerns, particularly when large corporations use aggressive strategies that deprive governments of significant revenue. In Nigeria, the oil and gas sector is a critical source of government revenue, and multinational corporations like Shell Nigeria are known for employing sophisticated tax avoidance mechanisms (Onyeka & Udo, 2023).
The Nigerian government has implemented various measures to curb aggressive tax avoidance, such as transfer pricing regulations and the establishment of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS). However, these efforts are often hindered by legal complexities, inadequate enforcement, and limited expertise in international taxation (Okonkwo & Adeoye, 2024). This study evaluates the tax avoidance strategies used by Shell Nigeria, examining their implications for government revenue and policy reforms.
Statement of the Problem
Tax avoidance by oil companies in Nigeria has significant implications for revenue mobilization and economic sustainability. Shell Nigeria, as one of the leading players in the industry, has faced criticism for its tax practices, which include profit shifting and the use of tax havens. These strategies, while technically legal, result in substantial revenue losses for the government, affecting its ability to fund public services and infrastructure (Chukwuma & Obinna, 2023).
This study examines the tax avoidance strategies employed by Shell Nigeria, assessing their impact on revenue generation and recommending measures to address these practices.
Objectives of the Study
Research Questions
Research Hypotheses
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The study focuses on Shell Nigeria and its tax practices from 2023 to 2025. Limitations include restricted access to proprietary financial data and challenges in generalizing findings to other oil companies.
Definitions of Terms